|
July 30, 2009
Cal-OSHA sued for alleged inability to protect farm laborers
By Susan Ferriss
The American Civil Liberties Union and the United Farm Workers Union
filed a lawsuit this morning against Cal-OSHA, accusing it of not being
capable of protecting the state's 650,000 farm laborers from heat injury
and death.
The suit filed in Los Angeles Superior Court credits occupational safety
officials with stepping up enforcement in the wake of fatalities last
year.
But it says employers remain out of compliance with regulations. It
cites as evidence six farmworker deaths last year -- three more than
Cal-OSHA recognizes -- injuries of farmworkers this year and widespread
violations of laws that Cal-OSHA inspectors have found in recent months.
State officials, the lawyers said in a press release, "have failed in
virtually every possible way to create a system to protect these
workers, who provide 90 percent of the labor for
"Perhaps most glaringly," lawyers say, "Cal/OSHA has failed to establish
common-sense regulations that would provide potentially life-saving
water, shade and rest to workers who labor outdoors in temperatures that
regularly top 100 degrees F."
Dean Fryer, Cal-OSHA spokesman, said he couldn't comment on the specific
allegations in the lawsuit because the agency had not yet reviewed it.
But he said, "We've stepped up our enforcement much more than in the
past, and we've done a tremendous amount of educational outreach."
"There are still problems out there," he said, "but with all this
outreach we're doing, we're beginning to see results. The culture of the
workplace is changing."
Catherine Lhamon, assistant legal director at the ACLU in
She also said that the agency's enforcement action lacks teeth because
the Cal-OSHA Appeals Board often dramatically reduces fines inspectors
issue for heat-illness prevention regulations.
The suit outlines a number of cases of employers whose fines were
knocked down, even after fatalities, and cases of farm employers allowed
to keep operating despite violations observed and failure to pay
penalties.
The suit also complains that the state regulations -- which were
considered groundbreaking when adopted in 2005 -- are not strong enough
to protect workers because they rely on farmworkers to request breaks
rather than employers to use means similiar to those used by the U.S.
military to order workers to take breaks.
"There's nothing to scare the bejesus out of these employers to get them
to treat farmworkers like human beings." said UFW president Arturo
Rodriguez. "There are more fish and game wardens than there are
inspectors out in the fields."
Rodriguez was part of talks in 2005 with Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, who
approved of new regulations as a means to prevent deaths.
|